If You Were The Only Person In The World

Can you imagine being the only human in the world?

Okay, that’s a bit extreme… but the key word is “imagine”… it’s a fantasy scenario for the purpose of finding something out.

To put it another way – Have you ever wondered what the experience would be like for you to be the only human on planet Earth?

If you think about it too realistically it would be fraught with all sorts of practical difficulties, especially for a human of this day and age who is accustomed to having modern amenities, which would take up too much mental time and space, and defeat the purpose of the experiment.

Although… maybe it would solve a lot of problems, since so many problems are caused by having too much time and space to think. Then again… is that really the problem which causes problems?

“We shall have to evolve
problem-solvers galore —
since each problem they solve
creates ten problems more.”

Piet Hein, The Only Solution grook

What about living somewhere remote, perhaps on a desert island, with no other people around and no internet connection, no computer, no mobile phone, none of those things which allow you to interact with other people on a regular basis even while being physically isolated.

Still too extreme?

Why am I digging this hole? Well…

It all began yesterday afternoon… actually it began the day I was born, and that began before that, but let’s stick with yesterday afternoon as a starting point.

I was browsing Psychology Today’s recent posts feed, and getting pissy with it, mostly becoming exasperated by what appeared to me to be the regurgitation of the same stuff over and over again.

“WHO IS LEARNED? A definition

One who, consuming midnight oil
in studies diligent and slow,
teaches himself, with painful toil,
the things that other people know.”

― Piet Hein grook

They might be using new terms, new buzzwords, and talking as though no one’s ever thought of that before, but it’s all stuff which has already been buzzed about before, decade after decade, all old problems with old solutions just repackaged as though NEW to sell it to those who are either bored of the old version, are suffering from amnesia perhaps induced by TMI or general forgetfulness (if I had a penny for… I hate that, let’s not go there), or haven’t heard about it before.

To be fair to everyone I’m being unfair to… I was already pissy before I started browsing PT’s feed.

I’d tried writing a post earlier in the day, got interrupted too many times (some of those times were me interrupting myself because I was boring myself with what I was writing) in an uninspiring way, lost my focus but didn’t really have focus in the first place which was the real problem. Reread what I’d written to try and get back into the flow which wasn’t a flow to begin with, saw it all as regurgitated old thoughts, and decided it was all rubbish, trashed it, deleted.

My mind gets like that when it’s tired.

It becomes a crotchety old person who is fed up with everything.

With a dash of sullen teenager who feels stuck in a small town and wants to venture out into the big wide world… the crotchety old person knows that the big wide world is just a larger version of the small town.

Plus a pinch of bored child that thinks the stuck in the mud game which the sullen teen and crotchety old person are playing is dumb… let’s play something else instead, but what?

We’ve played everything and all games suck say the crotchety oldie and sullen teen in unison, well at least they agree on something, thinks the child then suggests inventing a new game… but all new games are simply old games repackaged as though NEW and IMPROVED. And around in a circle we go.

“Whenever you’re called on to make up your mind,
and you’re hampered by not having any,
the best way to solve the dilemma, you’ll find,
is simply by spinning a penny.

No – not so that chance shall decide the affair
while you’re passively standing there moping;
but the moment the penny is up in the air,
you suddenly know what you’re hoping. ”

― Piet Hein, A Psychological Tip grook

So after being pissy with my own thoughts, I decided to get pissy with the thoughts of others… which made me pissy with myself for doing that and thinking like that.

Luckily, the one without an age weighed in and directed me to a post I’d bookmarked a few days ago but hadn’t read properly due to my dyslexia playing up – it becomes more pronounced when my mind is tired, and can cause problems not only with reading but with hearing too, all words entering my mind become scrambled…

Which is sometimes hilarious – my mind replaced the word ‘free’ with ‘tree’ and whatever I was reading where someone kept banging on about freedom became all about treedom which was more interesting, and the word ‘fears’ became ‘pears’, which somehow made more sense in context – but it can also be frustrating.

This is the post I returned to, to reread – Plagued by Self-Doubt? Get a Conscience-ectomy! The “I once was lost but now I’m blind” path to a conscience cleared. by Jeremy E. Sherman, Ph.D.

I was still experiencing dyslexic hijinks, so I read it back to front, from last paragraph to first, which seems to help reduce the anagramming function of the dyslexic mind.

I’ve linked to and excerpted Jeremy E. Sherman’s posts before on my blog. I like his spin on things. Don’t always agree with his spin, but I enjoy that part of it too. He’s a deep thinker with a big dose of radical, different and innovative thought, who isn’t afraid of sharing his view in his own unique style. I like that!

What I don’t usually like is listening to podcasts… I’m mentioning that because he linked to one in his post, a podcast he’d recorded which went with the post, and under normal me circumstances I’d have ignored the link, but since I was bored of normal me I decided to click and listen.

In his podcast he was having a conversation with himself – doing two different voices, one for him and another one for the other him.

I had a hard time distinguishing who was who since the voices were very similar and trying to listen out for the difference made listening to what was being said difficult – I find listening to not as complex podcasts difficult anyway… so I gave up after a few minutes.

The idea was fun though… and since my posts are me having conversations with myself, I felt a sudden huge burst of connection with Jeremy which made me forget my pissy.

I love it when this happens –> OMG I’ve found someone as weird as me who appears to be on a similar weirdo wavelength!!!

However… when I get excited like that about finding someone who appears to me to be similar to me… I’m usually in for a crash landing.

So I’ve finally learned to put the breaks on it.

“Wisdom is
the booby prize
given when you’ve been

– Piet Hein, Wisdom is grook

Still, even with breaks on, I could get excited enough to explore the guy online. Do some Mars in Scorpio cyber stalking. There’s quite a lot of him online.

I checked out his Youtube – Neither Ghost Nor Machine: How Life Happens

The video I picked to watch was fascinating. I didn’t understand a thing that was being said, but sometimes those are the best videos to watch and things to explore.

Here it is in case you’d like to be confused too… for those who can’t see the embed, it’s called – We try. Nonliving things don’t. What’s that about?

Maybe it’ll all make perfect sense to you, be easily understood by your mind, and you can show off about it in the comments on this post if you really need to do that kind of thing… I’ll try to be all “I’m so happy for you, thank you for sharing that!” rather than “Fuck off you twat!” about it. I can’t guarantee I’ll succeed since… what do I get for succeeding!?

Perhaps the problem I had with understanding it had to do with my not really trying to understand it. I sort of didn’t care… what do I get for understanding it!?

It didn’t help understanding matters that I got distracted wondering why his head was tipped slightly backwards… is that how you hear yourself better? … was another him giving him advice while he was video-ing himself?… and then I replicated the pose to see what happened if I did it, nothing happened… no, I’m wrong, I got even more distracted, by related but unrelated thoughts.

Afterwards I checked out his mentor, Terrence Deacon, briefly, but I didn’t want to cyber stalk two people at once, not on a tired mind day anyway.

So I returned to my original target, and because I’d half-watched that video, I noticed a result in the first page of Google results for “Jeremy E. Sherman Ph.D.” which I’d ignored before – which turned out to be a blog post critiquing J.E.S’ work, arguing against it, even going as far as to suggest revoking his Ph.D…

shit he’d really annoyed them…

they were particularly pissy about the “Trying Human” theory which he’d discussed in the video. Did they understand it!? Not sure if they did… hard to tell since I didn’t.

I’m not going to link to the Against Jeremy E. Sherman post because I only skimmed it, and it’s typical anti someone and their opinion rhetoric, but if you really want to read it just do the same search I did. Bet you don’t and won’t… what do I win for winning that bet!?

As I was skimming the argument against Jeremy and his ideas, a thought suddenly occurred to me which I jotted down quickly on a post-it:

If you didn’t have that other person + their opinion to fight against – What would you do?

That thought tied in with so much to do with me, my psyche, my mind’s wiring… I do love to fight against, not sure if I love it so much as it’s a habit which goes way back and has become a part of me and I’ve learned to appreciate it, even if I also have learned not to appreciate it for as many reasons as there are to appreciate it…

And it tied in with a comment chat I had with someone on my previous post – Mars in Scorpio: Intelligent Anger and Passion – wherein they mentioned a “battle of wits” they’d been having with another blogger.

The battle of wits can be an addictive activity… even when we know we shouldn’t engage with a particular opponent, it can be hard to resist the bait, and the lure of possibly winning against someone who has stacked the odds in their favour.

“Men, said the Devil,
are good to their brothers:
they don’t want to mend
their own ways, but each other’s.”

― Piet Hein, Mankind grook

I’ve been involved in a many of those throughout my life. It’s a way of sharpening the sword of your mind, but it can dull the sword of your mind too.

Because after a few of those battles, you realise that there are shortcuts to winning them and you don’t really have to be clever, smart, learned, informed, intelligent, etc, at all to win it. In fact being stupid and stubborn with your stupid wins those battles more regularly than not.

The best kind of stupid to be during a battle of wits is intelligently stupid. But of course you have to be free or tree of the need to prove to someone whom you think is an idiot that you’re smarter than they are.

If you think your opponent is stupid… why are you trying to win a battle of wits against them? What do you get if you succeed!?

“Problems worthy
of attack
prove their worth
by hitting back.”

– Piet Hein, Problems grook

I grew up with people whose main means of communication was through argument of the kind which usually oftne takes the form of a battle of wits… later on I realised it was a battle of twits, but that was later on, and it was the type of realisation which required that I accept that I was a twit too. Ego no like… even if ego says it’s a no-ego.

My opponents were narcissists – a type of fictional character who exists in RL whom Jeremy E. Sherman writes about on his PT blog – Ambigamy – both directly and indirectly.

In his bio he states that he’s a Psycho-proctologist:

“I also call myself a psycho-proctologist. I spend a lot of time on the question: What is a butthead since it can’t just be anyone you butt heads with? In other words, what is an objective definition of out-of-bounds behavior? In a free society we don’t want to dictate what people should do, but you still have to put a leash on buttheads or it won’t remain a free society.”

– excerpt from Jeremy E. Sherman’s Bio

He’s funny…

Which is partly what makes his work so interesting to read and explore.

This morning I perused some more of it. I know my interest will wane soon, but for the moment it’s waxing, might as well keep going until the going stops on its own.

I read this – Novum Trivium: Teaching Our Children How to Spin, Unspin and Decide What to Spin By Jeremy Sherman – on Edutopia.

A site which mainly features articles about education from a teacher’s perspective.

There are many titles about what should be being done in education but isn’t, what needs to be improved, how pupils are disconnecting from learning, how teachers can make learning more and less something or other…

“Experts have
their expert fun
ex cathedra
telling one
just how nothing
can be done.”

– Piet Hein, Experts grook

Basically the usual human rhetoric which ends up making us all feel weighed down by human failure after failure rather than uplifted by possibility, opportunity…

Sure it often speaks of the opportunity and possibility for success but…

How often does the word ‘success’ when used generate positive associations and how often does it generate negative ones, and when it generates both simultaneously – which ones outnumber the others? Which side would win in a battle of wits against the other?

I really enjoyed reading the Novum Trivium article… I loved Jeremy’s ideas to teach the three stages of Spin:

  • Rhetoric: How to spin
  • Critical Thinking: How to unspin
  • Emotional Intelligence: How to wonder about what to spin

Partly because it made me feel better about growing up with narcissists, and the things you learn as a child of narcissist parents, which includes all three of the above, since that’s the bread, butter and knife.

Children of narcissists learn the art of spin around the same time that they learn to walk and talk, usually before since narcissist parents teach spin from before you’re out of the womb. There’s spin around why you’re being created… and you’d better get with that programming.

Learning how to unspin comes when you’re trying to cut the knot, the umbelical cord which was never cut, which ties you to your narcissist parents forever and ever in sickness getting sicker, which death does not necessarily part, death might make it even harder to part ways and go your own way.

How to wonder about what to spin… comes when you realise that being able to spin and unspin does not stop the constant circling around in a circle. You may have cut the cord, the knot, but you’re still entangled in the loose ends regardless of how frayed, fragile and brittle they are.

“Losing one glove
is certainly painful,
but nothing
compared to the pain,
of losing one,
throwing away the other,
and finding
the first one again.”

– Piet Hein, Consolation grook – his very first and very deep grook

What I loved the most about the Novum Trivium article was that it introduced me to the grooks of Piet Hein.

I really grok those grooks.

I was about to say “That’s it…” but then I realised I hadn’t explained the title of this post, and the bit at the beginning.

I could just leave things as is…?

Perhaps because of growing up as a child of two narcissist parents…

Perhaps because of growing up during a time when the unhealthier aspects of narcissism were gaining ground and momentum (ie. greed is good)…

Or maybe because I would have been that way regardless of nurture, other influences…

I’ve often been confused about who I was… and one of the tactical experiments (aka coping mechanisms) I applied to the confusion was to ask myself – Who would I be if I was the only person in the world?

The purpose of that question was to attempt to imagine the self without input from the other.

Similar questions are:

What would you buy if you had all the money in the world, didn’t have to be financially responsible?

What would you say if you could say anything you wanted to without having to consider others reacting to it in a way which made you censor your speech?

What would you enjoy if you could do so without someone getting annoyed with you for enjoying it and making it something you must not enjoy because it is “bad for you”?

What would you do if you could do anything you wanted to do… without negative consequences?

The last one is particularly tricky if you give a shit about others experiencing negative consequences due to your actions, but if you are only concerned about negative consequences for yourself then it becomes easier to answer… although you still might want to consider the impact it has on others as that might impact you in the long term, but if you’re myopic and only consider the short term, never connect dots, think karma only works one way – the way you want it to… then never mind.

“People are self-centered
to a nauseous degree.
They will keep on about themselves
while I’m explaining me.”

– Piet Hein, The Egocentrics grook

If you grow up with narcissists… your actions become all about how they affect the narcissists. It can get to the point where you decide to become a statue because moving at all in any way causes pain and problems for the narcissists, which in turn is your problem and pain.

If you grow up with narcissists… who you are is all about everyone else’s identity and self, their narrative, their persona, facade, etc, and it can get very confusing because your identity and self shifts with theirs, for theirs.

They’re the hero today so you’re the villain, victim or random bystander. They’re the villain today, so you’re the victim, or just a witness to them victimising someone else, perhaps you’re their fan, their support system, a flying monkey if the victim proves to be feisty. They’re the victim today, you’re the hero or victimiser or both – that one is very confusing.

Because narcissists depend entirely on others, on those around them, society, acquaintances, friends, family for their sense of self…

Introspection and self-reflection is just not something they do… naturally. They can fake it and fake it in a way which makes it look more real than those who really do it (because those who really do it aren’t doing it for others, so they’re not focused on how it appears or what others think about how it appears from the outside – it’s an internal activity not an external one), if given enough information of how it is supposed to be done, especially how it is supposed to appear superficially to others so that others think you’re doing it and acing it.

Narcissists can fake anything and are masters at it… not necessarily because they’ve mastered the “it” they’re faking being masters of.

They don’t have to do that, they just have to appear to do it, or even better just “squawk”* loudly enough about doing it – HEY EVERYONE I’M BEING AUTHENTIC, MINDFUL, EMPATHIC, etc… in such a manner that others totally go along with it (anything to shut them up, right, besides it looks good and if it looks good… who cares what it really is).

*the “squawk” is a reference to something Jeremy E. Sherman said in a post – How to Tell Gloataholic Gaslighters Off

I didn’t agree with his list of things to do when dealing with a “Gloataholic Gaslighter” simply because his advice leads to further complications if you’re dealing with a narcissist who is doing that, but hey… I guess even experts can’t resist the baited lure of a battle of wits which goes around in an endless circle of increasing pointlessness.

One of the experiences you might have once you’ve been spat out of a battle of wits with a narcissist, or any prologued interaction with them, or even a short one, is a sense of confusion of self…

Who are you? How much of who you are or identify as being is reliant on others, on what they say about you, think of you, how they react to you and how you or they or others interpret the reaction, etc?

To answer some of those types of internal questions, I created the – who would I be if I was the only person in the world – imagination experiment.

Who would I be, what would I say and do if no one else had any say in the matter?

If no one else was around… who would I be, how would I experience being me?

For me that experiment helped me locate my “authentic” self in amongst the white noise of selves created for me by others and by myself in an attempt to please or suit others in other ways than pleasing.

One of the thoughts which sometimes comes up when pondering being the only human alive, for me anyway, is… you don’t have to “try” to be, say or do anything.

You don’t even have to “try” to survive… it doesn’t matter if you do and it doesn’t matter if you don’t, no one is going to give you a success or failure, thumbs up or thumbs down on it, gold star or black mark score on it.

The only one who can do that is you… and if you survive that’s not what you’re focused on, if you don’t survive that’s not what you’re focused on.

In some ways, you’re a tree, which just does what a tree does…

Now… That’s it!

Say whatever you want in the comments… pretend you’re the only human on planet Earth… okay, I see the glaring problem with that too – it may be pointless to comment on this post if that were true.


  1. Great post 🙂
    This same premise/question I’ve considered deeply a few times too – we can find ourselves at a point in life where the identities and roles we play are no longer valid, so bereft of these we can feel as if we’re the only ones in the world – meaning that when no-one depends on us and us not on another, what role would we really choose for ourselves?
    Of course there’s dependence everywhere and we’re rarely truly independent – the coffee this morning and food this afternoon means I’m dependent on the whole world, thanks to imports!
    However, at a more ‘local’ level we mostly fit into defined roles we’ve chosen, fell into, desired….all sorts of elements to do with other people mean we somewhat warp and bend ourselves to ‘accomodate’ one another. Social conditioning hugely plays it part in defining for us the ‘part’ we ‘act’ in life. Life gets us to places where we have to consider how much of our authenticity and ingenuity have we unbeknownst to us, lost along the way?
    So imagining being alone on earth is a good inner compass helper….to see if we’ve warped too far from being ‘true self’
    Similar to yourself, I conclude, we should ‘just be’….then authenticity shines, which happens to be a gift to our life and the lives of others as a bi-product of being who we really are.
    A narc would have to shine from within than vampire the shine from others, in a world with just them in it. They’d learn that if they were alone. Hence why loneliness is the existential crisis that’s at the heart of most, as the co-dependence yields bliss or despair. Imagine being completely alone will reveal the narcissist in us all – forcing us to ask that terrible question; “what is it I give to others, and what is it I NEED from others”
    When we truly reflect upon that with the scales of inner truth, it is beautiful to illuminate where we go wrong with others and how we add to the evolution of mankind.

    When free of this existential crisis of despairing loneliness, because you know you’ll always add to creation no matter what, then you’ll attract the most amazing examples of this aswell as the worst narc’s in the world, because unconsciously they wish to learn from you, while destroying you in the process, which is only another path of learning to be the eternal Phoenix. 😉


    • Thank you very much, Bee 🙂

      I love what you’ve shared. I agree, there’s value in all aspects of the experience of being, including when we stretch ourselves far from our authentic shape and lose our sense of self, it gives us the experience of being a not-self which can help us to appreciate the natural self more, as well as offer us insight into others who are in the not-self part of their life journey. Each role we take on, try out, play out, gives us knowledge of the role, shows us that we can be that role when needed but that it’s not all of who we are, and gives us a personal point of reference and understanding of those who take on those roles too.

      We’re all part of the whole of humanity, just as every facet of ourselves is a part of the whole being that we are, and each part brings an original spark to the whole. Interacting with others gives us an external perspective of internal interactions, and vice versa. Those we meet outside of us are often reflected in internal meetings of inner facets.

      Narcs are particularly useful as mirrors, in some ways they are whoever we reflect on to them, the more they appear to shine to us, the more we’re giving to them of our own shine which we haven’t yet accepted as our own. Then there’s that point at which we switch from seeing them as shiny to seeing them as darkness, and just as we gave them our own shine we also give them our own shadow, which is part and parcel of our shine.

      Who was it who said that one of the most frightening things to see about ourselves is our own personal power – that was a wonderfully sharp insight.

      Being alone, whether in imagination or for real, puts us on the spot and in the spotlight, it’s a private audience with ourselves, that’s a tough audience 😉


  2. I’ve only skim this post and will read it again later. The words free and tree in your post struck me, this morning I came across a quote “If you don’t like how things are, change it. You are not a tree.” Jim Rohn and here you read free as tree. I thought for a second calling human a tree in the quote is bit funny, but well it does make sense when I consider it again.

    Can you imagine being the only human in the world? Sure. It took me less than half a minute to imagine what I would be doing. It’s very fascinating idea, me being the only human in the world 😉 Will add the answer to this question in the post I’m writing halfway.

    During the day, many thoughts went thru my mind, things I wanted write in the new post. However, by the time I began my post in the evening, most of those thoughts disappeared into thin air. And so I was looking a bit at my human design chart and then saw your new post. Thank you for your inspiring question 🙂


    • Thank you, Rev 🙂 I look forward to reading your post.

      I seem to have a bit of an thing about trees at the moment, they keep drawing my attention to them in various ways. It’s intriguing when something just keeps reaching out to you and asking for your attention, particularly when it’s slightly surreal 😉

      How can Jim Rohn be so certain that “you are not a tree”? 😀


      • Yup lol. Not sure why my mind keeps reading the JR quote as ‘Move. You are not a tree.’ where it should be Change it. Maybe I was a tree spirit in one of my past lives 😀 The new post is up, hmm… I’m all over the place, hopefully you enjoy it 😉

        Liked by 1 person

        • I love the new post! It’s excellent 🙂

          I left a comment but I was slightly distracted because I decided to look Jim Rohn up while I was writing it – typical of an Aqua Merc, I could have waited until I’d finished writing the comment or done it before, but no I had to do it then and there… all over the place indeed! 😉 How did you end up on his quotes? Did you have to read him because of work and team building stuff? He’s one of those people who is constantly trying to say clever things.

          Have you ever checked out your Celtic Tree sign? If not, here’s a link – https://www.whats-your-sign.com/celtic-tree-astrology.html


          • Nope, I never read any of JR’s works except his quotes. The first time I heard a JR quote was from my muse, I’ve quoted it in my new post. How I was reminded of his quotes again was while reading Everything was beautiful and nothing hurt, then again you probably have quoted JR in your recent post too 🙂

            Celtic Tree sign, ah, I’ll check it out. How about yours? 😉


  3. *whew* Deep. As I’m experiencing my own brain fog right now…I woke up late and the world has been off kilter ever since, I’m just going to address your initial question. I may write more about the others at some other time after I’ve had time to digest them. You’ll receive full credit obviously. So
    “Who would I be if I was the only person in the world?” I have a bunch of different thoughts pinging off my cerebral cell tower. The first one (rather sarcastic in tone and I’m sorry about that. It’s just that kind of day) was “I would be all by myself.” But digging deeper I’m going to reference a couple of recent (within the last two decades anyway) films – “I Am Legend” and “Survivor”. Both deal with men who are utterly alone. One believes himself to be the last person on earth and the other is stranded on the obsequious desert island because of an accident. One thing that happens to both heroes is they both go slightly mad (insane).

    Over the years as I’ve become more and more isolated by choice, I’ve been told again and again “People need other people.” The therapists weren’t being sarcastic nor channeling Barbra Streisand or anything..as I understand it an individual needs to connect with other individuals There’s something in the human’s programming, probably left over from when we lived in caves and had to live in large groups to merely survive. If that connection is lost, so say the therapy people, the individual left alone loses a large piece of his or her humanity.

    I don’t know if that’s strictly true for everyone, because everyone is an individual and trying to generalize humanity is a really pointless effort, in my opinion. Some of us (me at least) really enjoy our own company and don’t do well if we’re placed in a situation with other people. And if the reason we really enjoy our own company best is because we don’t associate with other people is a conundrum too large for my weary brain to solve. At least not today.

    Great questions and post as usual Ms. Ursula. One of my favorite parts of your posts is the introduction to writers, philosophers and that kind of folk that you introduce each time. Piet Hein’s grooks are something unique!


    • Thank you very much, Melanie 🙂

      Great share! Lots of deep food for thought!

      Many of my favourite films and books, stories, are about people living alone for one reason or another, often by choice. I prefer the ones which don’t have zombies, mutants and other monsters which make life difficult for the person going it alone. Where the person just lives on their own and everything is fine. But of course it’s not as dramatic and thus entertaining as someone being alone and nothing is fine until other people show up and make it fine. In one of my favourites stories everything was fine until other people show up, force the loner to return to civilisation and the loner goes insane because civilisation is effing nuts 😉

      I think there’s truth in the concept that people need people, but it’s not the whole truth. It’s not a truth which works for everyone, it’s not a truth which works all of the time for all of the people.

      It’s more true for extroverts than it is for introverts, those who are more extroverted thrive when with other people and tend to go stir crazy when alone, whereas those who are more introverted tend to go stir crazy if they have to constantly be around other people and can’t spend time alone.

      It also varies according to who you’re with and why you’re with them. How you feel when you’re with them. How they feel when you’re with them and thus how they react to you, which gives you feedback. If the people you’re with don’t like you for whatever reason or if you don’t like them (perhaps because they don’t like you), then being with them is going to make you feel worse than if you were alone. Whereas if the people you’re with like you and you like them, then being around them is uplifting, a pleasure, soothing.

      It’s like music – if you listen to music you like, it makes you feel good. If you listen to music you don’t like, you’ll feel not good about it.

      Spending time with certain people can actually cause a loss of humanity because the only way to survive being in the company of certain people is to switch off and become more of a robot. For instance if you have to spend a significant amount of time in the company of narcissists/narcissistic people you’ll eventually go insane because they’re superficial, illogical, constantly playing mind games, bitching, whining, moaning, completely obsessed with themselves and talking, always talking and saying absolutely nothing of any substance – just the endless talking will drive you bananas. The only way to maintain your balance in that kind of company is to switch off human mode. If human mode is switched on you’ll end up wanting to kill them or kill yourself, whichever stops the noise and torture of being with them quicker.

      We’re coming up fast to that time of year which tends to prove the opposite of what your therapists have been saying. It’s one of the most stressful times of year partly because we all feel obliged to spend more time with people whom we don’t want to spend time with, by the time new year comes along we all feel broke, busted, drained, potentially homicidal and suicidal and when asked what our resolutions are – avoiding people is probably the one we’d all like to include in that 😉

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Hey Ursula🌻

    The idea of being isolated from other humans makes me think of the Jean Auel books… specifically, The Valley Of The Horses. I dont know if you’ve read it, but a short summary is a prehistoric young woman lives completely on her own after being exiled from the people she lived with. She finds a Valley, decides to winter in the cave and stays three years. She winds up with a horse and a lion, both rescued as babies and raised by her.

    I think in the absence of human contact, I would probably try for animal “friends”. Obviously wild animals wouldn’t be pets but this is imagining. I dont know if I would miss human contact. I’m pretty comfortable with my own company. I don’t have a lot of face to face contact right now, except Ben and older daughter. Younger daughter only comes around to borrow my car.

    The three months I spent bedridden with no TV, no internet, limited contact with my family… I spent a LOT of time in my head. I’m not afraid of the darkness inside.

    Like I wrote in a recent post, I’ve been through reconstruction twice, I’m confident in my ability to handle whatever comes my way.

    Being the only human would just be a different set of circumstances. I’d keep going until I injured myself in some stupid accident or got eaten by an animal I was trying to make friends with.


    • Hey Angie 🙂 Cool imaginings!

      I agree, it comes down to how comfortable a person is with their own company. And their ability to think outside of the box. Just because we may be physically alone doesn’t mean we’re alone unless we see it that way and won’t allow ourselves to see it any other way.

      Experience helps and influences our opinions, perspective. If a person never spends any time alone, then being alone becomes an unknown, and unknowns generate fear. But if you experience time alone, then it’s not an unknown but a known, and the known is familiar. If the time you spend alone is stressful, then that’s the association made with it which can be hard to disassociated from. If time spent alone is relaxing, while time spent with others is stressful, then that becomes the template. There are so many variables.

      In many ways life is all about spaces which we fill in.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Perhaps you understand my warnings/desire to commune better now. 5 years and all has come to pass–but we’ve barely gotten started.

    –Scout Dedalus


  6. I find it telling that you segued into the odd bit of info of the other user with the weird search terms in an (perhaps unconscious) attempt to merge the two of us as the same person. This is a telltale sign of one who projects victimization from past traumas.

    I certainly hope you find some peace from whatever it is that haunts you so.


    • Thank you, Nathan, for the peace wish 🙂

      Sharing my very messy human self is what I do on my blog, if what you’re looking for is telling signs of drama triangle stuff where I’m making loads of mistakes you’ll find lots of it here in my writing, whether in a comment or a post. I’m not totally sure which bit you’re referring to, but why did that bit catch your eye in particular?


  7. Clicked on the Jeremy Sherman YouTube vid on your blog today. I wonder what an I trying for? Am I trying too hard or not trying at all? I’m contradicting myself… I gave a deadline to forget her if we don’t reconnect by then and also set another condition to see how long my feelings for her will last. Basically, I dug a hole for myself lol. I always smile when you call yourself a mistake-making mess because I see myself as one too.

    Sorry to ramble on your comments section again.


    • Hi Rev 🙂

      A couple of weeks ago I read this article – https://scottjeffrey.com/heros-journey-steps/ – which you might find interesting since it talks about the Hero’s journey and it sounds very much like you’re on one of those.

      Later I explored Joseph Campbell whose work is used for that article, and ended up watching some Youtubes of old lectures of his

      This one is about love and the search for Anima:

      He mentions not knowing what he’s doing when it comes to love – that is an intrinsic part of the experience of love. While you can try to make decisions, and the mind will try to set deadlines, control the situation, the heart wants to go on its travels into and through love, however it unfolds, so that it can harvest the fruits of the experience.

      Saw an intriguing film last night – The Phantom Thread – you might find it interesting as it shows that when it comes to love and our muses, nothing is ever straightforward.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Thank you very much, Ursula 🙂

        Ah, The Phantom Thread, I meant to watch it some time ago, but never get to it. Read a brief review, but mostly cos the male lead is Daniel Day Lewis. I remember him from In the Name of the Father and The Age of Innocence and he is a great actor. Read the plot and a more in-depth review earlier. Indeed, intriguing, nothing is ever straightforward… will probably try to watch it during my break.

        I read the SJ Hero’s Journey you linked, it does sounds like I’m on one, but don’t think I’m the kind that will impact humanity. Then watched Joseph Campbell – On Becoming An Adult YouTube. He told a story of the initiation of a boy to a man in some culture that the boy will fight a masked man personified as God, power, authority, etc.. And the masked man will let the boy win after a good fight and put the mask on the boy’s face. My first thought is I don’t want to wear the mask, I want to break your mask. Then later Campbell said in other similar stories that the boy in fighting, has broken the image as fact and understand it as a metaphor, That which I agree. Not sure if I’m mistaken what he said.

        I was a little sick the past two nights, however, on both nights I had rather vivid dreams which is rare these days. Especially on the first night, I was cycling in a tunnel, with the doctor who treated my hand, into this building. This building is like a world itself. Many different levels and areas of social, work and play activities happening at the same time. At one level, there was a cocktail or tea party for some business function, and someone said I should try some, food is good. As I make my way to the pantry, I see lizards, centipedes, worms whatever crawling insects/creatures all over the floor and ceiling. The dream I had on the second night wasn’t any gross like the first one, but it wasn’t nice too.

        Guess if I don’t need to rush a project tonight, I might have another bizarre dream lol.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Just a thank you can’t express my appreciation for you from reading my posts, revealing insightful perspective and meaningful comments-chats that we had. When my hectic schedule ends in a month, I would really like to write n dedicated a post to you 🙂 Meanwhile, wish you well and smiles always!


      • Hi Ursula,

        I wrote a new post, hope you check it out 🙂 Not sure how you will read it, maybe you would let me know. And I certainly hope it would not confuse or shock you.


          • Thank you, Ursula 🙂 Not sure if you read my reply to your comment on my blog. Anyway, I inserted the buzz” story in the new post of you would read.


            • Fyi only. I tried to reblog one of our post today but it doesn’t show up on my site. Not sure if that needs moderation too or the glitch is from my site. I’m checking with the support forum. WP isn’t so straightforward with some functions, I might’ve do it wrongly 😀


              • The Reblog function has been a glitch-mare since they updated it several years ago – it used to be easy to use and after the update it became an annoying side quest in a video game, and if you do manage to do it the “prize” for doing it isn’t worth it 😉 If you really want to reblog a post of mine you will find it simpler to copy/paste it. The man who created copy/paste died recently, he definitely changed the internet when he added that feature.


                • After I send a help request in the forum, I called off the idea to reblog your post. But ya, if another time I want to reblog any post, cut and paste would be my option.

                  Cut/copy-paste I do that day in day out… Yup I read about Larry Tesler, he is gone but his invention will live on for the longest time maybe. What could one do to replace such a simple and easy to use function? It’s simple to be difficult, but difficult to be simple lol hehe


              • Thank you, Ursula!

                Btw, when I tried to reblog yr old post this morning, I wrote a short comment: ‘Then he look’d off some place in the distance… At something only he could see’ I get amused by what people think I’m thinking when I do that. The post suits my mood today. Is there life after death? Trepass here and find out (phrase from image at end of your post) Love it!

                I read this long ago and was reminded of it today. Wouldn’t remember where this post is if it not written on the same day as today 😉


  8. I’m sorry I just realized that “R” mistake press reply from my phone wp reader. You may want to delete that 😉

    I’m never stingy with smiles but I doubt anyone could make my eyes smile again. Then again the question, who is it you saw in them? 😝

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.